Andrea, Just what I was looking for! Thank you. I think the plain vanilla CC license you suggested is fine. I wonder what kind of feed-back CC licensees get from users? I'd like to see how the images get used. Now I have to figure a quick and easy way to re-do the file names of everything. Major job - like transferring CD's and vinyl to mpg. Hey, there's a sideline for someone. AZ Build a 120/35mm Lookaround! The Lookaround E-Book 5ed. NOW SHIPPING http://www.panoramacamera.us > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [SPAM] Re: Free-almost free pictures? > From: Andrea Coffey <why@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, August 06, 2009 1:31 am > To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students > <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > At 01:45 06 08 2009, lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >So I would have some sort of free down loadable album (PDF) of a > >selection of pics? > Yes. I believe that's how many of the print-on-demand websites work. > >I do Blurb books and highly recommend them. They are available at > >cost. I could load the pics (not the layout which is a Blurb > >copyright) into a PDF. I would then sell higher rez files at > >conventional commercial rates. > That's sounding interesting. > >I'm thinking a start would be to simply have "Royalty Free Pictures" > >in the web page meta file list. I don't want to go the mini-stock route. > If you're thinking "royalty free", you may consider using one of the > Creative Commons licences. Creative Commons has done the work in > drafting a set of licenses, which are available for people to use. > The frequently asked questions page is a reasonable place to start: > http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions > There's a page to choose which license most suits, by answering just > a few questions: > http://creativecommons.org/choose/ > So on choosing my preferred options, I arrive at the following license: > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/au/ > -- > &i (:
