Re: Looking for photos of ORBS and related "paranormal" subjects

[PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx]

Andy,

        You can disprove specific items by explaining them by physical facts but then you must make the leap that since there are no unexplainable paranormal stuff then they don't exist.

But they still might exist. You just haven't run into them yet?

        The other problem is one of definition. Say you find something paranormal but you can explain it by some type of physics or physical facts that we don't know yet. Is it still paranormal?   Were x-ray or other phenomenon discovered thru the ages paranormal stuff until they were explained? Were the Salem Witch Trials based on paranormal stuff when they happened but now are explained by fungus ergot (LSD) on  rye, wheat, or barley stock? So you need a definition of paranormal.

 

Roy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In a message dated 12/13/2008 1:32:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, andpph@xxxxxxx writes:

Roy,

Agreed that things we can't see can be captured by cameras ... but X-rays
for example can't be "imaged" by our standard cameras and lenses. There is
no disputing that strange things happen but not accounting for accountable
factors is questionable investigative practice.  ;)  ;)
andy


PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> Trying to prove a negative is hard, especially as there are things captured 
> by cameras and other devices that are not seen by the naked eye such as x-rays
>  etc. Plus the fact that there is more gravity in the universe then can be 
> accounted for which is why the physicists are looking for dark matter. I think 
> this article would just be mere speculation and not of any proof.
> Roy

 

---

Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now.