RE: How many techniques?

[Chris <christopher.strevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Since it is the end product that is important the image must be judged on that. The rules of the entry should say any techniques may be used so long as the original image was produced by photography.

 

Chris.

 

---

From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Roberts
Sent: 23 July 2008 23:55
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: How many techniques?

 

Michael, I don't think you read this question thoroughly.  The "techniques" involved had much to do with the vision of the artist.  There was no question about shutter speed, f-stop, equipment etc.  It all had to do with the ultimate image and the complexities of achieving it.  I think that is within the purview of your interests.
Don

editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

In general, I find discussion re: "technique" to be tedious and ultimately unimportant.

What *IS* important is the photographer's vision. I'd much rather hear about that.

 

Michael

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory [mailto:fyrframe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 09:43 PM
To: 'List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students'
Subject: How many techniques?

I'm curious if anyone would think it an interesting theme for a future gallery to offer up images that hold the highest number of techniques such as levels, filters, layers, masks, etc.? For me, I think the most "techniques" in photoshop I have used is about 4. This could translate I guess to either an image almost excellent from the start, but more likely a less than profound imagination._grin Take care out there, Gregory www.fireframeimaging.com www.ebbtidegalleryofgifts.com http://soundexposure.org