Michael, I don't think you read this question thoroughly. The
"techniques" involved had much to do with the vision of the artist.
There was no question about shutter speed, f-stop, equipment etc. It
all had to do with the ultimate image and the complexities of achieving
it. I think that is within the purview of your interests.
Don
editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In general, I find
discussion re: "technique" to be tedious and ultimately unimportant.
What *IS* important is the
photographer's vision. I'd much rather hear about that.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory [mailto:fyrframe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 09:43 PM
To: 'List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals -
Students'
Subject: How many techniques?
I'm curious if anyone would think it an interesting theme
for a future gallery to offer up images that hold the highest number of
techniques such as levels, filters, layers, masks, etc.? For me, I
think the most "techniques" in photoshop I have used is about 4. This
could translate I guess to either an image almost excellent from the
start, but more likely a less than profound imagination._grin Take care
out there, Gregory www.fireframeimaging.com
www.ebbtidegalleryofgifts.com http://soundexposure.org
|
