Re: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
From: Pini Vollach <pinimage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:39:34 +0300
In-reply-to: <000d01c7761a$b8b0cbd0$2a126370$@net>
References: <089D9DB8-4898-4925-BC7D-D3118B88AE30@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY105-DAV6D19D53083C8C45C58DDBAD670@xxxxxxx> <DE29C296-407B-43D3-BEE4-2569AC1706CC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <000d01c7761a$b8b0cbd0$2a126370$@net>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)

????? Mark Lent:

As far as printing and postage, it won?t cost that much more to do 30as opposed to 10? I?m for sending to everyone?
Hope all of you are doing well today!

Cordially,

Mark Lent

Me Too !

Pini

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
  - From: Guy Glorieux

References:
- Re: current postcard count
  - From: Darin Heinz
- Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
  - From: lea murphy
- RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
  - From: Mark Lent

Prev by Date: RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
Next by Date: Re: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
Previous by thread: RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
Next by thread: Re: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux