RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
From: Mark Lent <mlent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:05:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <DE29C296-407B-43D3-BEE4-2569AC1706CC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <089D9DB8-4898-4925-BC7D-D3118B88AE30@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY105-DAV6D19D53083C8C45C58DDBAD670@xxxxxxx> <DE29C296-407B-43D3-BEE4-2569AC1706CC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acd2E+TkIK0gckHiQqaX25XsqXfi0gABqqng

As far as printing and postage, it won’t cost that much more to do 30 as opposed to 10… I’m for sending to everyone…

Hope all of you are doing well today!

Cordially,

Mark Lent

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
  - From: Pini Vollach
- RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
  - From: Rebeka Rodriguez
- RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
  - From: Emily L. Ferguson

References:
- Re: current postcard count
  - From: Darin Heinz
- Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
  - From: lea murphy

Prev by Date: Re: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
Next by Date: RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
Previous by thread: Re: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
Next by thread: RE: Weigh in on breaking down into smaller groups
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux