Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
From: lea murphy <lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:36:22 -0600
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20061204062535.03d34768@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <002601c7179e$1bfc7530$0a02a8c0@lui> <a06230902c199c902ee20@[192.168.1.5]> <7.0.1.0.2.20061204062535.03d34768@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Download time?

Lea

On Dec 4, 2006, at 8:27 AM, Jeff Spirer wrote:

It is completely unnecessary to set any image to 72dpi or 96dpi.

lea murphy

www.leamurphy.com

www.whinydogpress.com

blog: web.mac.com/leamurphy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
  - From: Emily L. Ferguson
- Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
  - From: Jeff Spirer
- Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
  - From: karl shah-jenner

References:
- Image cathedral at Les Baux
  - From: Guy Glorieux
- Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
  - From: Emily L. Ferguson
- Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
  - From: Jeff Spirer

Prev by Date: Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
Next by Date: Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
Previous by thread: Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
Next by thread: Re: Image cathedral at Les Baux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux