Your input provides a depth and level of communication I haven't seen on this list in a while and I truly hope you don't get frustrated by any lack of balanced response or participation. Your responses are thoughtful and i believe that i learn from them.
keep posting...trevor
PS: this is in no way a criticism of list participation, simply an observation of recent activity that is completely in line with the educational element of the list
Guy Glorieux <guy.glorieux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Darin,
Thanks for the thorough review of my gallery posting this week.
What I find particularly interesting/useful with this review, and those
you've made of other postings this week or previous weeks, is the extent to
which you go into the picture and deconstruct from both/both the technical
perspective (e.g. light, focus, color balance, etc...) and the content
perspective (i-e significance of the image). So once again, thanks for your
comments.
Regards,
Guy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darin Heinz"
>
> Self Portrait by Guy Glorieux
> Guy, as someone mentioned earlier, it's good to have a face to associate
> with the name. And it's a decent self-portrait, I might add. Focus could
> probably be a bit sharper, but with nobody monitoring the viewfinder, I
> think it's permissible. Compositionally, I think it was done very well;
> the
> barrels in the background and the lights in the ceiling create an
> atmosphere
> into which you are not intruding; you appear to belong there. The lighting
> on your face is warm and directional, so it agrees with the surroundings.
> Additionally, I would not have realized it was a self-portrait (for a few
> moments, anyway), largely because the bold _expression_ on your face and
> interesting background effectively distract the viewer from looking at
> your
> arm.
>
> ----- ------- -----
"The optimist believes this is the best of all possible worlds.
The pessimist fears it's true" - J Robert Oppenheimer
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger?s low PC-to-Phone call rates.