Hi, everyone... Trevor Cunningham wrote: > ...I truly hope you don't get frustrated by any lack of balanced response or participation... Really, all I am hoping to see is some more responses, some more participation, balanced or not. Each of us went through the steps to be included in this marvelous globe-spanning photography discussion list. If I remember correctly, the List has hundreds of members, only a handful of whom ever say anything. To me, that's organizing and conducting a meeting where everyone gets to watch you sleep. Without discussion, this list is pointless. Without differing viewpoints, nothing ever gets learned or innovated. And without viewer response to the Gallery postings, the photographs may just as well occupy a shoebox in the top of the basement closet. If the intent of the List is to share ideas, why are we collectively defeating the purpose? Darin Heinz Melbourne, Florida USA
