Saw the Epson 4800 and print from it at Keeble & Schucat today. Wow! From
a 12.6 mgbt file.
S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pini Vollach" <pinimage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 3:17 AM
Subject: Re: AW: Priner for Fine art photography
The advantage of Epson was the ability to control color management.
How R the HP and Canon regarding this criteria ?
Pini
????? Thomas Greutmann:
Besides the Epsons an Canons you might wantto look at the newer HP models
as well, eg. the HP 8750 (A3) or 8450 (A4). I am using the HP 8750 for
about a year now, mostly for black and white, and Iam still impressed
with the results. I tried Epsons before but I always had technical
problems -none of these with the HP.
Regards,
Thomas Greutmann www.blackandwhitegallery.de
----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
Von: "Veli Izzet Cigirgan" <veli.izzet@xxxxxxxxx>
An: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: 18.08.06 07:04
Betreff: Priner for Fine art photography
Hi all,
I am sure this topic has come up a few times, but technology changes,
so..
I am thinking of buying a new printer, instead of my old Epson 1290.
Of course longevity (pigment based inks?) is one concern. I also have
some
problems with clogging of the noozles, so this is a concern too. Of
course
usable color space, price, individual color cartridges, etc. are also
concerns.
At the time I bought the 1290, there was only one way to go ... Epson.
Later
I heard that there are also some Canons.. But this may be old news now.
So I would like to hear from people what printers they use, and how they
rate them.
BTW, snapshot printing and pictbridge is not important for me, but using
different papers (eg. watercolor) is important.
Thanks for the help.
Veli Izzet Cigirgan
