Bob <w8imo@xxxxxxxx> writes: > rebphoto wrote: > > I enjoy the fact that with digital I am not > > thinking in the back of my mind what the film > > has cost and what it will cost to have it processed! > Doesn't the client pay? And who covers your time in front ofthe > computer deciding which shots to save and any work done with software? In a commercial situation, the client pays some amount. Whether you bill the time or the lab costs separately, or roll it in to the expected price you quote, doesn't really matter (on the average and in the long run). Any given amount of "print improvement effort" is easier and hence cheaper in Photoshop than it is in a real darkroom. Some people are strictly interested in *taking* the picture, others are very interesting in the techniques to make the best-looking prints (or screen images, or whatever is needed) instead. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/> Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
