Trevor, must have been an incredible atmosphere! However, I think that if this is intended as a "double subject", the dancer should be sharper - or creatively unsharp due to motion blur. By the way, I love Granada, - where was the photo taken? In Sacromonte? Laurenz 2005/11/1, trevor cunningham <tr_cunningham@xxxxxxxxx>: > I completely agree with the loss of detail comment as my pictures are often > a bit dark, and that appeals to me for some reason despite the routine > comments on them being too dark! But he did have perfect hair and the > detail would have been nice, but not really supportive of the image in my > opinion. However, the lack of detail only adds to the darkness of the > background which could have used some seperation somewhere. Oh well, the > stage was probably forty square feet, the ceiling was seven to eight feet > tall at its max, and if I had been any closer I would have had a rose in my > mouth and been on stage with her This really was a double subject kind of > photo, her in the light, him in the dark alone with his pain. Gritty, dark, > passionate, this is flamenco. > > Thanks for the review, I really do appreciate it. > > Laurenz Bobke <laurenzb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Trevor Cunningham - > > interesting pose, but there's too much blackish background without > detail for me. > A wee bit of fill flash might have solved this without taking away > from the atmosphere. > Concentrating on the singer and leaving the dancer out of focus might > have worked, if the full face of the singer was clearly visible. > As it is, it is not quite clear who is the subject of the photo. > > > > "The optimist believes this is the best of all possible worlds. > The pessimist fears it's true" - J Robert Oppenheimer > > http://www.geocities.com/tr_cunningham > > ________________________________ > Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. > >
