> Sorry, again, but I didn't want anyone else to jump to the conclusion that > my waccom tablet and pen were in any way involved in the creation of this > "piece of art". ;-) Renate I think you should not attempt to "pre-empt" what people may or may not say: see or not see in their reviews. You have referred to something that I have already penned in this week's gallery review. But you don't need to justify, support, defend or explain your images here - at least not until you have heard how people view them. Should we care how an image was made in these days where programs such as Terragen can produce realistic looking landscapes ... why not produce artificial looking photographs? I seriously prefer to know nothing about the background to an image before I have had time to explore it. I'd even prefer not to know it's title because even that can place a straight-jacket on my imagination. Once I've taken the time to look, only then do I read the blurb (Additional Information) below. Bob
