But I'm sure it is clear to everyone that the grizzly bear is really a big fuzzy teddy bear on the inside! :-)
Sorry, again, but I didn't want anyone else to jump to the conclusion that my waccom tablet and pen were in any way involved in the creation of this "piece of art". ;-)
Renate
PS: No one should mind a good "tearing apart" from you, it's a growing experience.
On 9/10/05, Bob Talbot <BobTalbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My contribution to this week's gallery is actually a simple >
>crop of a photograph, but I certainly don't mind it's being >
>called art. :-) Thanks for the compliment, Bob.
It may have been intended as a compliment but it was addressed as and
intended to be an OFF LIST (private) one.
How can I preserve my Mr Angry reputation if such postings are
rebroadcast for general consumption? How can I now convincingly tear
your image apart in my open review when you've already let my true
feelings about it be known? :o)
I stick to using "Reply To" in my mailer ...
... that way it's easier to avoid such breaches of netiquette.
Bob
--
To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; to earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; to appreciate beauty; to find the best in others; to leave the world a bit better, whether by a healthy child, a garden patch or a redeemed social condition; to know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
http://www.imagesbyrenate.com
