Re: PF Exhibits on 27 AUG 05 - Dan's Review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Bob.....there seems to be a serious problem here, and I have no desire
whatsoever to find a solution.   Henceforth your posts will be filtered
into my trash basket.

-dan c.

t 09:26 PM 30-08-05 +0100, Bob Talbot wrote:
>http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery.html
>>Never done this before, so bear with me!  ;-)
>
>Well, all credit to you old chap: there's no better way of telling
>someone how it should be done that there is by showing them.
>
>In hindsight: how does the attempt (first as it is) compare with your
>own expectations of what it should have been.
>
>Earlier you said:
>>When I critique a photo, I try and look at its artistic merits only,
>>and avoid trying to second guess what someone pictured in
>>the photo may have been feeling or thinking at the time the
>>photo was taken.
>and
>>I expect people to evaluate it for what it is, and not worry about
>>the model herself, what she may or may not be doing at the time
>>of the exposure, or if she's comfortable or not.
>
>
>
>> Qkano: Caz
>> Cute happy snap, timed perfectly
>
>It's intriguing how such a seemingly innocuous commetn can be read two
>ways.  On the surface it's a compliment.  But when so short, against a
>background of 11 other longer reviews ... paranoia might suggest
>otherwise.
>
>An then, there is the "cute" tag.
>I'd expected (should I say been prepared for) a host of different
>comments on this image:  cute was not amongst them.  I'd expected
>people not to like it:
>
>Did the comment I attached to the image
>"The sort of photo everybody would take ... "
>mislead the viewer.
>
>I must say I've seen a lot of cute kiddie photos in may time (find
>them as booring as crap) and I don't remember a single parent showing
>me one like this - or even another one like it anywhere else.  Maybe
>it's because, not being a parent, I never got the "ooooh" genes
>switched on.
>
>I see much more in the image than it being a snapshot - but the
>snapshot tag is what it deserves in the reviewer's eyes.
>
>So who is wrong?
>
>Personally I'd rather have had utter dislike than "Cute happy snap".
>It's not a bad comment: it just does not fit with my own artistic
>preconceptions.
>
>Thanks for taking the time to review,
>
>
>BobT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux