Re: The old Raw vs JPEG: was Is a Batch of Photos ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I'm currently converting my Fuji S2 RAW files into DNG and working
> > from there.  Mostly because the DNG file is less than half the
size of
> > the original RAW.  I hope I don't regret it.  I haven't gone back
and
> > done it to older originals yet.

David

Is this "half" fairly consistent or is it less effective for
high-detail images?
It's hard to see how you can losslessly compress some images to 50%
unless the source "information" is hollow to start with.

Of course: raw is not raw.  Nikon's NEF format has less bits per
sensor than the camera does for intance (it's already been processed).

The real problem with proprietry raw formats is that they are
undocumented, not that one is better than another.
At least with TIFFs anyone can read them ... and the private tags too
if you have a mind to look inside.

Bob



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux