This is part of what bothers me about DNG, there has got to be a trade off
some where if you are loosing more then half of the file size.
Terry L. Mair
Mair's Photography
158 South 580 East
Midway, Utah 84049
435-654-3607
www.mairsphotography.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Dyer-Bennet" <dd-b@xxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: The old Raw vs JPEG: was Is a Batch of Photos ...
Bob Talbot <BobTalbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In terms of progress ... maybe it really is time for all manufacturers
to adopt Adobe's open source "Digital Negative" rather than their own
self-interest-generated "proprietary" raw formats.
Digital Negative (DNG) main page:
http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/main.html
I'm currently converting my Fuji S2 RAW files into DNG and working
from there. Mostly because the DNG file is less than half the size of
the original RAW. I hope I don't regret it. I haven't gone back and
done it to older originals yet.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/>
<http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
