lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > PFrs, > > I have no problem calling this photography - do you? > > http://www.art.ttu.edu/artdept/LANDMARK/SRO/01kauffman/kaufman.html > > Kim has been producing these excellent photographs for years - probably > one of the best using this technique. I'd say "photography" is the most-applicable normal category. Subject, check. Light, check. Lens, check. (And I'll accept a pinhole without complaint of course.) Despite the lack of "camera" in the conventional sense, these are relatively conventional photographs -- realistic, not abstracted to the point where subject identity is hidden, not heavily manipulated, etc. They look nice. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/> Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
