> You're a goof! That's a complement. Seems to me that you could have a > blast with your little model ( I love the double meaning here) in > "real" photographs. To name just one, they could be quite charming > comments on conventional photography. I'm thinking the photo should be > perfectly acceptable as a conventional image. The usual expectations > for a photo could then be challenged. AZ When you look at some of what passes for "street" photography it woulf be amusing to start placing "Judy" and some of her friends - CLOTHED - into real street scenes and create "decisive moments" to order. After all, photographers have been staging street scenes for over a century, using actors. Using <generic term forgotten> characters in place of people is just bringing it up to date. To do it well, so to all intents and purposes the result *looks* like a real street scene will require vastly more photographic understanding and skill than posessed byt the 21st-century generation of AF/AE rapid fire [monkeys with typewriters] photographers. The challenge - and it's a huge one - is to do it well. Just buy Judy some clothes! Bpob
