Re: Rules, was; comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Rules, was; comments
From: Gregory david Stempel <fyrframe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:17:28 -0800
References: <020601c4ff44$d975c6d0$49f5f004@DIMENSION8100> <6.1.2.0.2.20050120151030.03876380@hyperreal.org> <000801c500be$855ba850$0401a8c0@toshibauser> <5.2.0.9.0.20050122230816.00b75258@incoming.verizon.net>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Steichen and Steiglitz were two who tried to create a "foundation" for art photography. Would this be rules?

Take care,
Gregory david Stempel
FIREFRAMEi m a g i n g
www.americanphotojournalist.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rules, was; comments
  - From: dave6134
- Re: Rules, was; comments
  - From: Don Roberts

References:
- comments
  - From: Eclipse Agency
- Re: comments
  - From: Jeff Spirer
- Rules, was; comments
  - From: Gregory david Stempel
- Re: Rules, was; comments
  - From: dave6134

Prev by Date: Re: Getting an audience at a gallery
Next by Date: RE: Gallery Opinions
Previous by thread: Re: Rules, was; comments
Next by thread: Re: Rules, was; comments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux