The definative Gallery review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



<IMO>
Good gallery this week!
</IMO>

<FACT>
Jim
Another AF-image: that is, the subject is smack bang on the mid line.

I can't deny it's overall a lovely image with a great background ...
but how much better if the sign had read "no swimming" instead of
"private".
If the image has a weakness, the lack of sun on the head when
everywhere else is beautifully lit is it.

Alberto
OK, an example of an image which is destroyed by  the title: or should
I say, REPLACED by the title.  I'm still trying to understand the
title / explanation that I'm missing the opportunity to explore the
photo.

It's a pleasant abstract.  Nicely framed.

Can't see any flag.


John:
Last week's portrait is still in my mind (or maybe its the thoughts of
the other 70% we didn't get to see ;o).   No, last week was a very
memorable shot: it worked because it was different but also because it
seemed so natural.

This week's is nothing special.  It's just a profile.  It does not
have the magic to be remembered thought.


Greg.
You can see where the animal paused to dump!

It;s an interesting shot on several levels but not a masterpiece.
Tracks in snow always appeal to me.  They are indeed a sort of
gestalt: we are seeing not what is there but a trace of what was.  So
much action.

Hare or rabbit?

Don
Death and the US flag.
An interesting symbolism best not explored.

That flag completely ruins the image for me.


Harris
Everything is sharp apart from the horse's head and rider.

I'm not sure on this: the traditional approach is to pan (?)   It
shows movement for sure but I've grown used to sports shots that
freeze the subjects and blur the background.




Strevens
16228 bytes.

Too small to appreciate I'm afraid.

Get a faster computer and render a few more pixels !


It looks a giggle btw: just needs to be bigger!




Achal
One of the best shot's I've seen by Achal.
The tile really makes something of what would have been a bland
vertical.

Don't think I've much to add: it's just a lovely image.  As someone
else said: pity about the placing of the copyright: since you have a
border why not place it there?


<FACT>


<IMO>
Thanks to Andy for sure.

Who is David though?  David Hazy?


</IMO>


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux