Re: Stereo 360-degree Panoramas

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>So when you rotate your pair of cameras, do it about the
>mid-point between them. Getting the transverse movement
>of the camera between two shots to be not more than just
>a cm or 2 isn't going to be difficult.

>So I think it's a non-issue.

Brian

I'm sure you are right for real 360-degree panoraminc cameras.  My experience
with stitched panoramas is that "fusion" works MUCH better when you rotate
the camera (single) about the right spot (deninitely forward of the camera-body
mount).  Even 6-inch lateral movement can give noticeable parralax errors
for mono-shots.  For stereo shots (where tiny amounts of parallax are tfundamental
to the effect) I'm just guessing that the problems - for *stitched* panoramas
would be magnified.

Perhaps you are right though: if you avoid any near-far type elements too
close to the camera it probably would be a non-issue.

Bob


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux