Qkano <wildimages@lineone.net> wrote/replied to: >And unlike the cost of film, you just keep (*) shooting and shooting >and shooting and shooting and shooting and shooting and shooting till >you get a good one >Ain't digital wonderful ;o) Oh ya baby. I'm learning to pan with a bird in flight. It doesn't cost me anything but with film it would be expensive. I find that if I see something that might make a good image, the more I shoot the better. There's always one that's a bit sharper or looks just a bit better than the rest of the series that are mostly the same but not quite. I simply erase the rest, zaap. Then go back the next time and try again. I find it very interesting that so many photographers have found their D2H or 1D's lower pixel count to not be a problem. And here we were worried about 6 megapixels not being enough... What that means is I can crop more :-)
