> Thank you Per for the reviewing !
> BTW - Only you this week ?
Well, yes, Per, you were the only one.
(unless you count my contribution:
<<<... there is a good set of images.
I can honestly say there is not one amongst them that is without
merit.
A travel brochure illustration from Per
>>>
The comment on your shot was not meant in a bad way: it could easily be the cover of a holiday magazine.
I would thank you (Per) for reviewing my picture but I felt
"Great Auk, no doubt. Making everybody think
it is extinct, just to preserve some privacy..."
came over more as just a comment
What that said to me was the photo had nothing to say about itself as a photo.
I can live with that.
I'd still thank Per for taking the time to review the others.
<<
Yes, a bit surprised... There has been a couple of very long threads
that might have kept people busy...>>
Some people "whine" about the reviewers not doing thier jobs properly - we can't have it both ways. (Ever noticed how "back-seat drivers" are always so flippin perfect).
Can I say I do understand the complaints. I've now read quite a lot about how a critique should be delivered, how destructive it can be to criticise without dressing it with sugar, how we should find something positive to say. But I have to accept that style is not for me.
If I particularly like an image - I'll contact the author off-list to say so. That avoids a lot of aggro!
Bob T
Freeserve AnyTime - HALF PRICE for the first 3 months - Save £7.50 a month
www.freeserve.com/anytime
