Re: Top or Bottom? (poster, that is!) WAS Re: Dimming hot lights

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu>
Subject: Re: Top or Bottom? (poster, that is!) WAS Re: Dimming hot lights
From: Qkano <wildimages@lineone.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 07:32:52 +0000
References: <003601c3a156$f6ff6d20$0401a8c0@p700> <3FA5A335.20959.3A068F@localhost> <5.2.0.9.0.20031103162124.00b1b928@mail.ewol.com>
Reply-to: photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu
Sender: owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu

> How very rosenable.

Hahahahahahahhahaha.


Dave

rosenable = unreasonable?


Leica larf, pick in good old Bob R.  ;o)

Q

References:
- Re: Dimming hot lights
  - From: Mike King
- Top or Bottom? (poster, that is!) WAS Re: Dimming hot lights
  - From: Brian van den Broek
- Re: Top or Bottom? (poster, that is!) WAS Re: Dimming hot lights
  - From: me

Prev by Date: Re: New Voigtlanders
Next by Date: Re: my new photo site
Previous by thread: Re: Top or Bottom? (poster, that is!) WAS Re: Dimming hot lights
Next by thread: Re: Top or Bottom? (poster, that is!) WAS Re: Dimming hot lights
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux