Ex. www.apple.com Now for some that will be a hotlink while for others it will just be text. But I wrote it and sent it as text only.
Therefore hypertext links, though made with very basic HTML, are not necessarily coming from the originator of the text. Further, HTML is not "different" than a hypertext link but the source of it, coming from one of two places - either the creator of that doc or the app which is 'reading' it. Of course if someone creates a sig file in a web authoring app (or in some mail programs which automatically create these files in HTML) it will show up in another's text only mail program as gobblygook. But really who cares. :-) (text only thank you).
Norman
Jim Davis wrote:
Fletcher Jernigan <Fletcher_Jernigan@comcast.net> wrote/replied to:
I believe there is confusion between "HTML" and "hypertext links".
See http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/H/HTML.html
Your signature, along with those of others, contains a "hypertext link". Mine does not since I do not have a web site to reference.
Well, I for one am not confused, but you are right that many are.
I can see HTML as text with lots of funny looking garbage in it. This is Hypertext markup language code. Since I could see it in a certain signature, the sig was therefore HTML. Someone told me that mine was HTML. Well it ain't.
Hey, in order to get back on subject and introduce some actual photo talk, let's have the annual talk about shooting autumn foliage. Ya, the time is soon on us.
So, is a CPolarizer filter a good thing to bring out colours?
Should it always be used for foliage, or are there times you do not want to use it?
Again, my sig is pure unadulterated text. I hope that's clear to all. :-)
Jim Davis Nature Photography http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/
-- Norman Jackson Ford - / PhD (ABD)/ Dept. of Comparative Literature (and Cultural Studies), _University of Hong Kong_
/Visiting Lecturer,/ HD in Multimedia the Art School, HK Arts Centre
mail: 2/F 47 High Street Sai Ying Pun Hong Kong
(852) 2914-2923
