I didn;t win the bid on ebay so I'll keep searching for an enlarger and lenses :)
At 08:02 AM 6/11/03 -0700, you wrote:
Generally, this is not a good idea. An enlarger lens must reproduce accurately from a close, flat field (film) to another close, flat field (paper). The requirements on a normal camera lens are not so stringent in that it must reproduce from a far, not so flat field (scene) to a close, flat field (film). This allows the camera lens designer to design for other desirable characteristics such as speed. This is why using a camera lens for enlarging is generally not a good idea. An excellent macro lens designed for close, flat field reproduction can be used to excellent effect, but there's still the mount problem.
Regards, Bob... -------------------------------------------- "Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying the object which is abused. Men can go wrong with wine and women. Shall we then prohibit and abolish women?" -Martin Luther
>From: "Pablo Coronel" <pcorone@unity.ncsu.edu>
> Anyone has done that? > is that a good idea? > I found a couple of russian Leica mount lenses (screw 39mm) pretty cheap > and was planning to test them as enlarger lenses.
Pablo Coronel Ph.D. Candidate Food Science Department North Carolina State University Room 39 Schaub Hall, Box 7624 Raleigh, NC, 27695
Phone (919) 515-4410 Fax (919) 515-7124 e-Fax (419) 818-7590 e-mail pcorone@unity.ncsu.edu http://www4.ncsu.edu/~pcorone