> Foundation member of the Society for the Preservation of Uneuphemic > Anglo Saxon English. Euphamisms only have a certain lifetime before they become as offfensive as the word they represent. In English (the language spoken in England btw) F??? C??? S??? are very ancient words ... but thier usage has changed beyond thier literal meaning. > But then we all know that bad language is much > more offensive than gratuitous violence, hey? Indeed ??? One of the most offensive euphamisms of today (IMO) is the phrase "collateral damage". > But does it all matter anyway? Do we need a 'Parental Advisory' on > the the list? The west is turning to nanny state mentality. Laws passed on the back of "pornography" are quickly used by politicians to suppress other stuff they would rather we did not know ... > Let's start a serious discussion whether an explicitly > pornographic image can ever be real art. Only if shown on the PF gallery ;o) <<<That should shake the tree a bit.>>> Nah, the real test would be whether the gallery staff (all female) would allow a full-frontal male nude, standing to attention, to be in the weekly gallery. Mmm, meat and two veg might not mix well with my breakfast cereal ;o) B
