Re: LENSES

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students<photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu>
Subject: Re: LENSES
From: Steve Hodges <shodges@iinet.net.au>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:38:43 +0800
References: <BA41C11F.18EA%steveross.effigy@virgin.net><078601c2b723$6b793880$6501a8c0@bobblakely> <3E20F19C.299A59F1@iinet.net.au><009c01c2ba01$12530700$6501a8c0@bobblakely>
Reply-to: photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu
Sender: owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu

Bob Blakely wrote:
> 
> Oh come off it Mr. "I just want to argue to show everyone how smart I am but
> screwed it up."

I'll take it back then.  If lenses were marked 1/2, NOBODY would ever
confuse it with a half.

Steve

References:
- LENSES
  - From: Steve Ross
- Re: LENSES
  - From: Bob Blakely
- Re: LENSES
  - From: Steve Hodges
- Re: LENSES
  - From: Bob Blakely

Prev by Date: Re: LENSES
Next by Date: Re: National Geographic & Disclosure
Previous by thread: Re: LENSES
Next by thread: Re: LENSES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux