Bob Blakely wrote: > > It's the same as 1/ (for all practical purposes). > > 1/2.8 would be more universally recognized, wouldn't it. :-) No, because someone with a lens marked 1/2 would start sprouting that they had an F 0.5 lens. Steve
Bob Blakely wrote: > > It's the same as 1/ (for all practical purposes). > > 1/2.8 would be more universally recognized, wouldn't it. :-) No, because someone with a lens marked 1/2 would start sprouting that they had an F 0.5 lens. Steve
|