Now focus on the word memorable, instead of art. Does the definition of art become irrelevant? My definition of memorable would be to evoke an emotional response. Can anyone think of an example that doesn't include this? Now, if that is true, what are the implications on our approach to photography? Regards, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Gregory david Stempel [mailto:fyrframe@centurytel.net] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:39 PM There is no longer a definition of art, except maybe in the eye of the beholder. Take care, Gregory david Stempel FIREFRAMEi m a g i n g
