: > Now focus on the word memorable, instead of art. Does the definition of art > become irrelevant? If we focus on memorable and throw away the word art (elitist crap anyway) then what makes a memorable photo? Thinking back beyond the last few weeks in the PF gallery there are certain images that have left an impression. It does not mean they were necessarily the "best" but maybe they hit a chord at the right time, answered a question I didn't know existed at the time, threw open whole new thoughts ... I could start to list some ... Bobert's (?) man in cell Jeff's umbrella Colette's boy (hand coloured print) John Palcewski's "Mother's Dream" Dave Buyens - Night Liftoff Dave D-B's bonfire ... Chandler's "Smiley in the woodpile" - still don't like it but still remember it. Bob Rosen's Chicken Little ... well, that was memorable because it was better than .... More will come back no doubt Thinking back there must be a lot of images I've liked at the time but forgotten ... Bob
