Re: Gallery Impressions for 20 October 2002

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>as seen at
>http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery.html
>

Meester Spirer: clock face

Well, I'm a sucker for this kind of old world, grainy, slice of life 
stuff.  So I like this clock whether it's a working one or exactly 
vertical or leaving me with a large white space to the Northeast to 
wonder about or not.  Nifty texture in the sheet metal of the face 
and the pattern of waning depth of field accentuates just how 
important XII is to our sense of time.

ELF's Zakim Bridge

Sorry I didn't remember the techie stuff.  I think I didn't polarize 
this one, Velvia, long zoom probably somewhere around 120mm, couldn't 
stop down far enough to get a sunstar without a tripod and I left it 
over in Cambridge about 2 blocks from the Lechmere station.  I did 
try polarizing one of them, but lost so much speed that I gave it up. 
Pretty much every color here is an artifact of the position of the 
sun and the choice of film and the clarity of the sky that day.

Shipman's egret

We got a nice clear eye here, and there's a look of purposefullness 
in it, too.  Looks like you got hardly a speck of depth of field, 
however, because the feathers and close side of the bill are soft. 
Amazing how a digital multiplier and 1.4 extender can romance one 
into thinking that things could hardly be more perfect.  Sometimes I 
fall in love with the feathers the birds leave in my yard and get to 
thinking they're as essential as the eye.  Anyone seen that book that 
Frans Lanting did of feathers?

Marilyn's white sweeties

I dunno.  I guess it's just not my style and I know it's yours.  Cat 
shapes are so beautiful and the lack of focus certainly accentuates 
the shapes but it's still just not my style.

Greg-o's modern American power worship

Yeah.  if only Edison gave a damn, we wouldn't have our world plagued 
with this sort of dangerous extrusion.  And if it were beautiful I'd 
applaud the compostion heartily.  I do like the harshness of it, the 
uniform tone of the sky contrasting with the sunlight sculpting the 
condenser cans.  The V shape of the whole maybe could benefit from a 
bit more exaggeration.

Talbot's big bird

Grownup or baby?  I'm wishing there were more contrast, to accentuate 
the powerfulness of this creature.  Somehow it looks so mild when the 
mythology is of such dominance.  A hairlight along the breastline and 
catchlight in the eye maybe?  And maybe get rid of all that space to 
the right of it, since it's looking at us.  (Galen Rowell always said 
that one should have space for a face to be facing towards.....) 
That would move the balance into a wedge shape - the rock ascending 
to the hind claws and the tailfeathers descending to the hind claws.

Jim Snarski's leggy blond

Awful lot of other blond data here.  And the leggy part is awful 
soft, sorta looks like the tree in front caught the autofocus and 
the" blond" was an afterthought.  No eyes at all, except the ones all 
over the coat and no bottoms to the leggyness.   I think the leggy 
needs all of it to be leggy to look leggy at all.  More like necky.

Anticapitalizer Harris' fire

Fire is so heavenly transparent.  How wonderful.  Stunning.  I agree.

Peeter's pose

This is pretty neat.  I like the unposed part of it - that the heart 
of the fire is not tidily centered behind the waist of the body.  And 
I especially like being able to see the fingers before the fire. 
Still I wonder why the debris is being burnt and not used in a 
fireplace or as fodder.  The contrast between the end of evening dark 
blue sky and looming clouds and the hot spot of the fire is 
especially nice as well.

King/Arthur Caesura

Not sure what the pause or break is here.  Interesting that the 
vendors in Haymarket have come into the modern age with those metal 
booths that craftspeople use at street fairs.  I think I like my 
slices of life to have some internal logic and I'm not finding that 
in this photo.  Maybe that's the caesura?

Mr. Cooper's city again

Yes.  It's definitely better to have it horizontal, and now I can 
look at it and wonder about all the things in the picture.  Is that a 
castle in the middle of the river?  How long is the bridge?  Can one 
get around the old fashioned iron fence to walk on the cement edge? 
The lights are all fine and nice but their softness contrasts with 
the relative sharpness of the rest of the scene and I wonder whether 
there would be an advantage to stopping down further to make the 
lights sharp too.

Scott's Gatehouse

Seems to be falling a bit on it's face somehow.  The tower is 
parallel to the left edge but the tree is leaning towards the sun at 
some other time of day.  I think I wish it were sharper, but maybe 
the nostalgia factor is accentuated by the slight softness.  I dunno. 
Wonderful how these 1850s structures of fieldstone in liturgical 
style with slate rooves and all that stuff were built as gatehouses. 
Imagine dreaming about actually getting the job of gate keeper and 
living in there!  What are T-Max and Tri-X effects?

Thanks to all for submitting, to Andy's staff for keeping it going 
every week and to all who will critique during this week.
-- 
Emily L. Ferguson
elf@cape.com  508-563-6822
New England landscapes, wooden boats and races, press photography
Beetle cats on the web at:
http://www.vsu.cape.com/~elf
http://www.beetlecat.org/store.html#yrbook


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux