Re: Comments on 22 June 2002 Gallery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



More photographs. Some leave me a bit puzzled, but that's creativity, I
suppose. I'll just take three for the moment.

Karen Powell - Blueberries

I like the composition. It sort of seems to be really easy to point a
camera at a plant, yet sort of afterwards I always wish I'd done it
differently, or noticed this or that. This has a nice unforced feeling
to it - just the berries as they are.

I'm not sure about the blurred leaves in the lower left - are they
out-of-focus, or could this be motion blur? I'd rather prefer them
either sharper, or totally blurred.

Someone said:
>  Might be possible to get a little more detail in the berries.

Problem in part is the jpeg compression. You've only used 33K of your
allotted 53 [hee!], and the extra 20K might well make just the right
difference. It takes time, but it's well worth learning how to jiggle
with the jpeg adjustments. (Bob Talbot is the master of the 49.999K
image)

I am no expert, but here are my suggestions for things to do:

(1) Did you use a tripod? Your eye and your tripod are (I think) more
critical than your lens.

(2) Read John Shaw's "Closeups in Nature". You can read a bit about it
on my web page, and for maximum effect you should purchase it by
clicking the Amazon.com link, and then I'll get 5% commission.

http://imaginatorium.org/books/photech.htm#shaw

Now at the same time, you should also order some other books

http://imaginatorium.org/books/topten.htm

because I will get more commissions at 5% from amazon, but also because
when the Shaw book arrives you will look at it for a bit, then feel
unwell. This will last for a period of a week or two, during which time
you will also be unable to look at your camera without feeling
miserable. But fortunately, you will have the other books to read. One
way to alleviate the dejection might be to look at the original version
of my first flower page:

http://imaginatorium.org/sano/higanb0.htm

This should make you feel better immediately. But after that I think
it's just practice. And looking at other images, among which:


>   Roderick Chen - Red

This is exquisite. Just two tomatoes in a bowl. And do you know what is
*really* unfair? This image is only 11K, yet visually it's jpeg-perfect.


>   Christiane Roh - Bourgogne, May 2002  "Shot with a Contax G2."

Nicely done, Christiane. It seems slightly odd to tell us the camera
without mentioning the lens; and this kind of shot is one where (afaics)
an SLR offers only advantages over a rangefinder.

I'm not quite sure about the way the flower behind has had its top
chopped off, yet somehow you've captured the iricity* very well.


* Don't ask. No, it isn't a word. "Iris".  What about "Bourgogne"? The
region of France - not so far from where you live - or is it also a
reference to the colour or the flower?


Anyway, for those who like that sort of thing, Roderick definitely gets
my "pic of the week".

Brian Chandler
----------------
geo://Sano.Japan.Planet_3
http://imaginatorium.org/


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux