RE: copyright?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 07:28 PM 6/15/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>You actually did a pretty good job for a non-lawyer. Even a
>lot of lawyers couldn't explain it that well. The only thing
>I would add, is that, contrary to what someone else said
>earlier in this thread, putting pictures on the Internet or
>the World Wide Web does not mean that you give up your
>copyright. Publishing it on the Web or the Net is no
>different legally than publishing it in a magazine.
>
>---
>Bob Schwartz (a lawyer)
>


Bob,

Getting back to my original question - I can sell one-time use of
un-copyrighted pictures I own (others may or might not also own them). What
rule of law would protected me from anyone re-selling or exploiting these
pictures?  In this case I have flea-market pics that may be of some
commercial value for illustrations. I can't say they are copyrighted - so,
is just the statement "(picture) may not be reproduced (by any means,
blah,blah) without written permission of (the owner)." enough of a legal
claim?  Does the term: "(Name), all rights reserved" have any meaning
legally speaking?

thanks,

AZ

Maker of Lookaround panoramic camera.
http://www.panoramacamera.us
         or
keyword.com lookaround


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux