On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:13:01PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > Thomas F. O'Connell wrote: > > >The implicit indexes are no big deal; they're just a sign of indexes > >getting created by PRIMARY KEYs on your tables. > > > >I'm not sure why you're getting errors. Is there a reason you did the > >schema dump separately from the data dump rather than a monolithic > >dump/restore? > > > I seem to remember encountering an issue some time ago with pg_dump > dumping tables in an order that prevented them from being reloaded. This problem is solved in 8.0's pg_dump. Not sure if 7.1 has enough information in catalogs to make the algorithm run correctly -- I wonder if pg_depend is needed, because AFAIR there was no pg_depend in 7.1. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>) "The Gord often wonders why people threaten never to come back after they've been told never to return" (www.actsofgord.com) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
