On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 8:33 AM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:45 PM Avinash Vallarapu <avinash.vallarapu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> However, I do agree with Lawrence that it is impossible to prove whether it is written by AI or a human. >> AI can make mistakes and it might mistakenly point out that a blog is written by AI (which I know is difficult to implement). > > > Right - I am not interested in "proving" things, but I think a policy to discourage overuse of AI is warranted. > >> People may also use AI generated Images in their blogs, and they may be meaningful for their article. >> Is it only the content or also the images ? It might get too complicated while implementing some rules. > > > Only the content, the images are perfectly fine. Even expected, these days. > >> >> Ultimately, Humans do make mistakes and we shouldn't discourage people assuming it is AI that made that mistake. > > > Humans make mistakes. AI confidently hallucinates. > I think this is a key point, and one that we could focus on for purposes of discouragement. Ie. "Blogs that are found to repeatedly post incorrect information and/or AI style hallucinations may be restricted from contributing to the planet postgres feed. This will be determined on a case by case basis." While it is likely impossible to come up with a set of rules that will satisfy some of the more legalistic folks among us, this would be a simple warning that would at least encourage folks to make sure they aren't posting bad information and leave a door open for enforcement if needed. And yes, this assumes that the folks running planet will enforce if needed, though I don't think it requires heavy policing at this point. Robert Treat https://xzilla.net
