On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:08 PM Steve Litt <slitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:39:20 +0200
Chris Travers <chris.travers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Exactly. And actually the first sentence is not new. The second one
> is a real problem though. I am going to try one last time at an
> additional alternative.
>
> " To that end, we have established this Code of Conduct for community
> interaction and participation in the project’s work and the community
> at large. This code of conduct covers all interaction between
> community members on the postgresql.org infrastructure. Conduct
> outside the postgresql.org infrastructure may call the Code of
> Conduct committee to act as long as the interaction (or interaction
> pattern) is community-related, other parties are unable to act, and
> the Code of Conduct committee determines that it is in the best
> interest of the community to apply this Code of Conduct."
Chris,
Would you be satisfied with the CoC if the current 2nd paragraph of the
Introduction were replaced by the paragraph you wrote above?
Yes. Or something like it. It need not be exact.
I recognize a need to be able to take enforcement to some areas off-list activity, for what it's worth.
SteveT
Steve Litt
September 2018 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
