On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:10 PM, James Keener <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I understand the concern, however, if you look at how attacks happenit is frequently through other sites. Specifically under/poorly
moderated sites. For specific examples, people who have issues with
people on Quora will frequently go after them on Facebook and Twitter.
these aren't a solution looking for a problem. If we just want to look
at the clusterfuck that is happening in the reddis community right now
we can see conversations spilling onto twitter and into ad hominem
vitriol.You haven't established that this is both 1) the PG mailing list's problemand that 2) this can't and won't be used to retaliate against those holdingunpopular viewpoints but aren't specifically harassing anyone.Now, you may say that (2) would be rejected by the committee, but I wouldcounter that it's still a stain on me and something that will forever appearalong side my name in search results and that the amount of time andstress it'd take me to defend myself would make my voluntarily leavingthe community, which would be seen as an admission of guilt, my onlyoption.
If you had read the policy, you would know that wouldn't happen as reports and details of reports are to be kept confidential.
People are shitheads. People are assholes. We're not agreeing to joinsome organization and sign an ethics clause when signing up for the mailinglist. The current moderators can already remove bad actors from the list.How they act outside of the list is non of this list's concern.
The lists are just one of many different ways people in this community interact.
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company