On 01/24/2016 02:42 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
1. If person B is not in the Pg community then it is up to the Rails community to deal with it.
2. If person B is in the Pg community they can request help.
I am open to wording on #2. I tried a couple of times but had trouble not making it a larger declaration that I think it needs to be.
How do you define “in the Pg community”? Is it someone who has posted to a known forum at least once? Someone who has been to a conference? What if they have never participated in a community forum, but use PostgreSQL at work? Maybe they would eventually submit a bug report or ask a question. How do you gauge that?
Me, I don’t think you can. If someone reports abusive behavior by a member of the Pg community, it should not matter whether or not the person doing the reporting is a member of the community, only that the reported abuser is.
In retrospect I revoke my support of this idea entirely. It just isn't
our jurisdiction. If doesn't happen in our yard then it isn't our business.
I would also note that this document isn't going to be the end all of
enforcement. Ultimately -core has the final say. -Core can determine on
its own if it wants to enforce against a particular community member
(with or without the CoC).
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
