Gauthier, Dave wrote: > The arguments against PG are not technical. A few more points that I didn't see in this thread yet that might help answer the non-technical questions: * There seem to be more commercial vendors providing support for Postgres than MySQL - because most mysql support came from that one company. http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support * There are bigger companies supporting Postgres than mysql. And yes, that'll still be true even if Oracle supports MySQL. http://postgresql.fastware.com/ * There are a number of extremely scalable commercial solutions based on postgres forks (greenplum, enterprisedb, aster, whatever yahoo uses, etc). These run many of the largest databases in the world. If you expect your app to grow to that scale; it might make your migration easier. * There are specialty commercial companies that support specific postgres features very well - such as Refractions specialized http://www.refractions.net/ which provide great postgis support. * There are enough large companies that depend entirely on each of the databases that make either one a save choice from that point of view (Skype). And the way Apple and Cisco use it for a number of their programs (google "cisco postgresql" or "apple final cut postgreesql" for links) are other nice datapoints of companies most managers would have heard of. > Dear Santa, All I want for Christmas is to be able to keep my DB. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
