Tom Lane escribió: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Tom Lane escribi� >> I don't think that testing rowMarks is the right thing at all here. > >> That tells you whether it's a SELECT FOR UPDATE, but actually we > >> want any cursor (and only cursors) to have a private snapshot. > > > The attached patch implements this. I intend to apply to 8.4 and HEAD > > shortly. > > Looks sane. Can we add a short regression test sequence that checks > for this? Something is wrong with the patch :-( I'm getting WARNING: Snapshot reference leak: Snapshot 0x1be5840 still referenced with a simple test case. Still investigating. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
