Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Weird behavior with "sensitive" cursors.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Interesting.  If I create an non-unique index on the table before
> declaring the cursor, FETCH throws an error:

> alvherre=# fetch all from c1;
> ERROR:  attempted to lock invisible tuple

I get that in 8.4 and HEAD even without any index, just trying the given
case.  It looks to me like this is a bug in the new snapshot management.
The cursor is using CurrentSnapshot directly --- it does not have a
private copy --- and therefore when CommandCounterIncrement happens
it affects what the cursor can "see".  The cursor should not be able
to "see" any tuples created after it was created.

I think we need to ensure that when a cursor is created, it obtains a
private copy of the current snapshot ... but I'm not sure where that
ought to happen.  Thoughts?

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux