Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane escribió: >> I don't think that testing rowMarks is the right thing at all here. >> That tells you whether it's a SELECT FOR UPDATE, but actually we >> want any cursor (and only cursors) to have a private snapshot. > The attached patch implements this. I intend to apply to 8.4 and HEAD > shortly. Looks sane. Can we add a short regression test sequence that checks for this? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
