Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane escribió: >> Well, the first problem is that 8.4 is failing to duplicate the >> historical behavior. > Oh! That's easy. I don't think that testing rowMarks is the right thing at all here. That tells you whether it's a SELECT FOR UPDATE, but actually we want any cursor (and only cursors) to have a private snapshot. Also, do we really need the Register bit? Won't the portal register its use of the snapshot anyway (or if it doesn't, isn't that a bug)? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
