Karl Wright wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >Karl Wright wrote: > >>I am afraid that I did answer this. My largest tables are the ones > >>continually being updated. The smaller ones are updated only > >>infrequently. > > > >Can you afford to vacuum them in parallel? > > Hmm, interesting question. If VACUUM is disk limited then it wouldn't > help, probably, unless I moved various tables to different disks > somehow. Let me think about whether that might be possible. Well, is it disk limited? Do you have the vacuum_delay stuff enabled? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/ "I would rather have GNU than GNOT." (ccchips, lwn.net/Articles/37595/)
