On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2017, at 11:33 PM, J Decker <d3ck0r@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Very similar to OpenSSL 1.0.2, plus its own extensions. That's not exactly
> "same".
>
> The same in that I can link/compile against either and not change any application code... not speaking of internals, just the API.
Well, that's not actually true. There are API differences. There
is a large common intersection that covers many legacy applications,
but newer features in each library are not present in the other.
Any many current applications. This app was all done with recent docs on recent version and I found 0 incompabilities.
I did run into a beta feature for 1.1.0 that was something about setting the fragment size... https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/214 but again that wasn't in 1.0 stable openssl either so...
--
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
