Re: [openssl-dev] Is X509_free(NULL) ok?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "openssl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <openssl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] Is X509_free(NULL) ok?
From: "Salz, Rich via openssl-users" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:06:20 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <CAD38tB2sz4ixpBfib91CJ511KeFjLfNcuUcWaD=cLX7d1v_zyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <82579724-69e3-df25-cf79-21bafbb7d44c@yahoo.com> <97DB5309-9808-48A4-A74C-BC43FA59DB9B@dukhovni.org> <CAD38tB2sz4ixpBfib91CJ511KeFjLfNcuUcWaD=cLX7d1v_zyw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>, openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010

Our intent is that all FREE functions can handle NULL.  If you find things missing or undocumented, please open an issue on GitHub.  Thanks!
 

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [openssl-dev] Is X509_free(NULL) ok?
  - From: Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [openssl-dev] Is X509_free(NULL) ok?
  - From: Ken Goldman

Prev by Date: Evaluation of OpenSSL stack software
Next by Date: Re: [openssl-dev] Is X509_free(NULL) ok?
Previous by thread: Evaluation of OpenSSL stack software
Next by thread: Re: [openssl-dev] Is X509_free(NULL) ok?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux