Damien Miller wrote: > > Finally, have you tested how this works with internal-sftp? > > > > I guess many large scale servers don't use internal-sftp because of > > logging requirements as discussed in an older thread but I bet that > > internal-sftp is desirable especially when scaling up so make sure > > to not neglect it. Thanks. > > I didn't catch the other thread, but internal-sftp logging should > work just fine. I failed to mention the chroot condition. There was a long-ish thread on logging from chrooted sftp-server some months ago (last year?). Damien Miller wrote: > I don't think timeouts should be implemented in sftp-server, but in > sshd(8). I have a prototype of a generic channel timeout mechanism at > https://github.com/djmdjm/openssh-wip/pull/16 That's a really good general solution, keeping sftp-server simple. Thanks a lot //Peter _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
