I don't think timeouts should be implemented in sftp-server, but in sshd(8). I have a prototype of a generic channel timeout mechanism at https://github.com/djmdjm/openssh-wip/pull/16 On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > Dear Darren and Damien, > > Do you like the proposed approach and cmdline option? > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Damien Miller <djm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > > Finally, have you tested how this works with internal-sftp? > > > > > > I guess many large scale servers don't use internal-sftp because of > > > logging requirements as discussed in an older thread but I bet that > > > internal-sftp is desirable especially when scaling up so make sure > > > to not neglect it. Thanks. > > > > I didn't catch the other thread, but internal-sftp logging should work > > just fine. > > > > e.g. with > > > > Subsystem sftp internal-sftp -l verbose -f daemon > > > > I see: > > > > Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session opened for local user > > djm from [10.130.80.1] > > Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: received client version 3 > > Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: realpath "." > > Oct 21 16:47:59 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session closed for local user > > djm from [10.130.80.1] > > > > -d > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openssh-unix-dev mailing list > > openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev > > > > > > -- > Dmitry Belyavskiy > _______________________________________________ > openssh-unix-dev mailing list > openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev > _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
